| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This table identifies the types of sensors used on TAO moorings and lists their accuracies. Most instrumental accuracies listed are based on pre-deployment and post-recovery calibrations and are the root mean square drift of a group of sensors. Mechanical current meters and current profilers accuracies are based on intercomparisons between co-located instruments. References where available are indicated by [#] in the comments column and listed at the end of the tables. Accuracies of sensors which are new to TAO moorings (longwave radiation, barometric pressure) or which have not yet been evaluated by TAO (water pressure) are those specified by the manufacturer and are indicated by [M]. In cases where sensors are paired with PMEL
supplied electronics (e.g., analog to digital boards)
calibrations include both the sensor and PMEL
electronics. Accuracies listed here (with the
exception of currents) do not include environmental
factors such as wind (on rainfall) or buoy motion (on
radiation). Measurement ranges listed are generally
those over which the sensors are calibrated. The
ranges over which a sensor will operate (determined
by the sensor and/or PMEL electronics) are listed in
parenthesis if they significantly exceed the
calibration range. A comparison of ATLAS, TRITON, and Improved
METeorological (IMET) mooring meteorological sensors
from a land-based intercomparison study at the Woods
Hole Oceanographic Institution in May-June 2000 shows
that in general the three systems measure to
equivalent standards of accuracy. The full report of
this intercomparison is contained in footnote [13]
below.
References: [1] Fairall, C. W., P. O. G. Persson, E.F.
Bradley, R. E. Payne and S. P. Anderson, 1998: A new
look at calibration and use of Eppley Precision
Radiometers. Part I: Theory and Application. J.
Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 15, 1229-1242. [2]
Freitag, H.P., Y. Feng, L.J. Mangum, M.P. McPhaden,
J. Neander, and L.D. Stratton, 1994: Calibration
procedures and instrumental accuracy estimates of TAO
temperature, relative humidity and radiation
measurements. NOAA Tech. Memo. ERL PMEL-104,
32 pp. [3]
Freitag, H.P., M.E. McCarty, C. Nosse, R. Lukas, M.J.
McPhaden, and M.F. Cronin, 1999: COARE Seacat data:
Calibrations and quality control procedures. NOAA
Tech. Memo. ERL PMEL-115, 89 pp. [4] Halpern, D., 1987: Comparison of upper
ocean VACM and VMCM observations in the equatorial
Pacific. J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 4,
84-93. [5] Plimpton, P.E., H.P. Freitag, and M.J. McPhaden, 1995: Correcting moored ADCP data for fish-bias errors at 0°,110°W and 0°,140°W from 1990 to 1993. NOAA Tech. Memo. ERL PMEL-107, 49 pp. [6] Serra, Y.L., P.A'Hearn, H.P. Freitag, and M.J. McPhaden, 2001: ATLAS self-siphoning rain gauge error estimates. J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech.,18, 1989-2002. [7]
Freitag, H.P., M. O'Haleck, G.C. Thomas, and M.J.
McPhaden, 2001: Calibration procedures and
instrumental accuracies for ATLAS wind measurements.
NOAA. Tech. Memo. OAR PMEL-119, NOAA/Pacific Marine
Environmental Laboratory, Seattle, Washington, 20
pp.
[8] McCarty, M.E., and M.J. McPhaden, 1993: Mean seasonal cycles and interannual variations at 0, 165E during 1986-1992. NOAA Tech. Memo. ERL PMEL-98, 64pp. [9] A'Hearn, P.N., H.P. Freitag, and M.J. McPhaden, 2002: ATLAS module temperature bias due to solar heating. NOAA Tech. Memo OAR PMEL-121, NOAA/Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, Seattle, WA, 24 pp. [10] Freitag, H.P., M.J. McPhaden, C.Meinig, and P.Plimpton, 2003: Mooring motion bias of point Doppler current meter measurements. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Seventh Working Conference on Current Measurement Technology, San Diego, CA, 13-15 March 2003, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 155-160. [11] Plimpton, P.E., H.P. Freitag, and M.J. McPhaden, 2004: Processing of subsurface ADCP data in the equatorial Pacific. NOAA Tech. Memo OAR PMEL-125, NOAA/Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, Seattle, WA. 41pp. [12] Lake, B.J., S.M. Noor, H.P. Freitag, and M.J. McPhaden, 2003: Calibration procedures and instrumental accuracy estimates of ATLAS air temperature and relative humidity measurements. NOAA Tech. Memo. OAR PMEL-123, NOAA/Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, Seattle, WA, 23 pp. [13]
Payne, R.E., K. Huang, R.A. Weller, H.P. Freitag,
M.F. Cronin, M.J. McPhaden, C. Meinig, Y. Kuroda, N.
Ushijima, R.M. Reynolds, 2002: A comparison of buoy
meteorological systems. WHOI Technical Report |
|
|
||
|
U.S. Dept. of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service National Data Buoy Center 1007 Balch Blvd. Stennis Space Center, MS 39529 Feedback Page last modified: Wednesday July 11, 2007 |
Disclaimer Credits Glossary |
Privacy Policy About Us Career Opportunities |